[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090406182149.GA28529@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:21:49 -0700
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Intel-IOMMU Alignment Issue in dma_pte_clear_range()
This issue was pointed out by Linus.
In dma_pte_clear_range() in intel-iommu.c
start = PAGE_ALIGN(start);
end &= PAGE_MASK;
npages = (end - start) / VTD_PAGE_SIZE;
In partial page case, start could be bigger than end and npages will be
negative.
Currently the issue doesn't show up as a real bug in testing because start and
end have been aligned to page boundary already by all callers. So the issue has
been hiden. But it is dangerous programming practice.
The following patch fixes the issue. It's applied on iommu-2.6.git tree.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
---
intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index fd7472f..bce4f6e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -732,8 +732,8 @@ static void dma_pte_clear_range(struct dmar_domain *domain, u64 start, u64 end)
start &= (((u64)1) << addr_width) - 1;
end &= (((u64)1) << addr_width) - 1;
/* in case it's partial page */
- start = PAGE_ALIGN(start);
- end &= PAGE_MASK;
+ start &= PAGE_MASK;
+ end = PAGE_ALIGN(end);
npages = (end - start) / VTD_PAGE_SIZE;
/* we don't need lock here, nobody else touches the iova range */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists