[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090406211931.GB8586@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:19:31 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>
Cc: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Jens Axboe' <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:12:08PM -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> Grr..making writeback as default would break people's setup that relies on
> the ordered semantics, especially in the embedded world. It's a big no-no.
I've added workarounds for 2.6.30 that provide the replace-via-rename
and replace-via-truncate workarounds for ext3 data=writeback cases.
See commits e7c8f507 and f7ab34ea.
There won't be an implied fsync for newly created files, yes, but you
could have crashed 5 seconds earlier, at which point you would have
lost the newly created file anyway. Replace-via-rename and
replace-via-truncate solves the problem for applications which are
editing pre-existing files, which was most of people's complaints
about depending on data=ordered semantics.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists