linux-kernel - Re: [GIT *] intel-iommu updates for 2.6.30 (second batch)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090407054818.GA5557@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:48:18 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] intel-iommu updates for 2.6.30 (second batch)


* David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 07:37 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I suspect these bits are the ones that broke the upstream build:
> > 
> >  drivers/pci/dmar.c:47: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or
> > ‘__attribute__’ before ‘dmar_tbl_size’
> >  drivers/pci/dmar.c:62: warning: ‘struct acpi_dmar_device_scope’
> > declared inside parameter list
> >  drivers/pci/dmar.c:62: warning: its scope is only this definition or
> > declaration, which is probably not what you want
> 
> Yeah, <acpi/acpi.h> was being included implicitly for me, but 
> certain configs don't do that. Alexander Beregalov sent a patch 
> for that, which I added to my tree before Linus pulled it.
> 
> Commit 46f06b72378d3187f0d12f7a60d020676bfbf332 is the fix.

No, that does not fix it - it's still broken with 
v2.6.29-9854-gd508afb. Try the config i sent.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/