lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:40:56 +0200
From:	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Chris Worley <worleys@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off topic: Numactl "distance" wrong

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Well, some user-space application may use these distances
>> to improve their binding.
>>     
>
> I'm not aware of any that does.

We have some people here that would like to use it ideally. But they
know numa distances is almost never available, so they don't really look
at using them...

> If it's true then the correct place would be to fix the BIOS.
>   

Come on, you know it's not going to happen for 99.9% on the existing
opteron boxes. We have many hardware quirks in the kernel, I don't see
why this numa distance problem would not deserve its own work around.


By the way, anybody looked at this on Nehalem boxes ?

Brice

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ