linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090407092108.GA17301@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:21:08 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> new features:
>   - event limit
>   - record time stamps
>   - SIGIO support
> 
> fixes:
>   - mlock accounting
>   - swcounter task clock vs NMI readout deadlock
>   - comments and such

Looks good so i've applied it, but got this build-failure on 32-bit:

  kernel/perf_counter.c:2345: error: implicit declaration of function atomic64_xchg

atomic64_xchg() is not implemented yet on the 32-bit side.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/