linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:23:33 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] various perf counter bits


another thing i noticed is that our CPU migration counters look a 
bit weird:

aldebaran:~/linux/linux/Documentation/perf_counter> taskset 1 perfstat ls
design.txt  kerneltop  kerneltop.c  Makefile  perfstat

 Performance counter stats for 'ls':

       0.686802  task clock ticks     (msecs)
              3  context switches     (events)
              4  CPU migrations       (events)
            285  pagefaults           (events)
        2183899  CPU cycles           (events)
        1492516  instructions         (events)
          24638  cache references     (events)
           1763  cache misses         (events)

 Wall-clock time elapsed:     0.694796 msecs


the 'taskset 1' binds perfstat to a single CPU - still we had 4 
cross-CPU migrations?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/