linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: Add support for Always Running APIC timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090407100956.GB9462@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:09:56 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: Add support for Always Running APIC timer


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> Len Brown wrote:
> > applied to acpi-test tree, pending x86 maintainer ack.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> > 
> 
> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>

hm, is this queued for v2.6.30 or v2.6.31?

If v31 then i'd prefer to have it in the x86 tree. The ACPI impact 
is incidental only, 80% of the patch changes x86 files - and it 
changes 'hub' files that frequently cause merge conflicts.

If it's going upstream real soon in v30, then no objections at all:

 Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/