[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239103951.4773.29.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:02:31 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Static/Runtime CPU/IO bound scheduling polices based on
CPU(s) to support complete spectrum of tasks
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:55:31PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > I am planning to prepare the followings:
>
> This seems all quite vague. Perhaps it would be good if you started
> with a clear definition what problem you're trying to solve.
>
This will solves 2 major problems:
1. Support complete task spectrum (Hard/soft/non Realtime) on one
system.
2. Take Maximum advantage of the each CPU core and treat each CPU core
as a System. So we can take maximum utilization of the Hardware.
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists