[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904070759050.4010@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: fix build with CONFIG_BRANCH_TRACER=y
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Can we please do it something like the following instead:
>
> #define if(a, ...) \
> __trace_if( (a, ## __VA_ARGS__) )
>
> so that you don't need to do that ", ## __VA_ARGS__" thing three times?
IOW, does this (TOTALLY UNTESTED) patch work?
Linus
---
include/linux/compiler.h | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 6faa7e5..cebfdcd 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -114,7 +114,9 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
* "Define 'is'", Bill Clinton
* "Define 'if'", Steven Rostedt
*/
-#define if(cond) if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
+#define if(cond, ...) __trace_if( (cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) )
+#define __trace_if(cond) \
+ if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
({ \
int ______r; \
static struct ftrace_branch_data \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists