linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: make the scheduler (even) more modular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090407164708.GH12226@hack>
Date:	Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:47:08 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Ziljstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: make the scheduler (even) more modular

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:36:11PM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
>Several of the functions in the core scheduler tests explicitly for class and 
>then to class-specific operations. This should be handled by the sched_class 
>interface.
>
>This patch-series moves 2 such elements over to sched_entity, or more precisely, 
>the priority part.
>
>Ingo, Peter: I forgot to CC lkml the last time around, sorry about this resend.
>

I like these two patches! Really nice!

You can add my reviewed-by if you need:

Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/