[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b1675090904071122k6a53295fwfffc336011edee8e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:22:01 -0600
From: "Trenton D. Adams" <trenton.d.adams@...il.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 on MacBook 2,1 fails to reboot (was Re: 2.6.29-git13:
Reported regressions from 2.6.28)
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> Trenton D. Adams wrote:
> Interdependencies between ALSA modules have changed. The Gentoo init
> scripts attempted to unload them in an order which deadlocked modprobe
> due to dependencies. The fix for Gentoo is to just not unload the
> modules on system shutdown. My Gentoo/amd64 Mac mini was affected by
> this too; fixed by userland update.
>
While that is interesting, I am not seeing that problem on my Gentoo
box (the macbook), which is completely up-to-date. 2.6.28 works, and
2.6.29 doesn't. Same init scripts, different kernels.
And sure, I could put a comment on the rmmod, in the init script, but
IMO that would be a hack around a _bug_. Which is fine for me. But,
is it worth leaving the issue in the kernel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists