linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13019] /proc/<pid>/maps offset output broken in 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:22:08 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13019] /proc/<pid>/maps offset output broken in 2.6.29

On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
> > Subject		: /proc/<pid>/maps offset output broken in 2.6.29
> > Submitter	: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
> > Date		: 2009-04-01 23:18 (6 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linuxppc-embedded&m=123862902916059&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
> 
> No, this shouldn't be listed as a regression from 2.6.28: if it's to be
> counted as a regression at all, it's 2.6.23's regression from 2.6.22.
> (We're about to deal with it in 2.6.30, but hardly worth backporting.)

Thanks, dropped from the list already.

Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/