linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49DBCB8D.7030509@goop.org>
Date:	Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:21 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	x86@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
	tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte_range

Andrew Morton wrote:
> So across the aptch series the aggregate change to mm/ is nil, and this
> is wholly an x86 patch series?
>
>   

Functionally, yes.  I also changed the name of the 
arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode() -> arch_start_context_switch() which affects 
kernel/sched.c:context_switch(), but it is just a name update (which 
also required an asm-frv update, which defines its own no-op version of 
the macro rather than using the default no-op one, for some reason).

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/