[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239074880.17426.7.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:28:00 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 08:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> One thing that I find intriguing is how the fsync time seems so
> _consistent_ across a wild variety of drives. It's interesting how you see
> delays that are roughly the same order of magnitude, even though you are
> using an old SATA drive, and I'm using the Intel SSD. And when you turn
> off TCQ, your numbers go down even more.
>
It may help if we rule out the ext3/jbd transaction growing code. I'd
be pretty surprised if it made for long pauses, but its worth checking:
-chris
diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
index e6a1174..a7c4f79 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ int journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
* for joiners in that case.
*/
pid = current->pid;
- if (handle->h_sync && journal->j_last_sync_writer != pid) {
+ if (0 && handle->h_sync && journal->j_last_sync_writer != pid) {
u64 commit_time, trans_time;
journal->j_last_sync_writer = pid;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists