linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29-git13: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9b1675090904062123u42a00a80y3a4385740ecc0121@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:23:29 -0600
From:	"Trenton D. Adams" <trenton.d.adams@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-git13: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
>> >
>> > This went through bisection, but looking at the email log, I tend to
>> > suspect that maybe Trenton marked some versions good even though they
>> > weren't (because they got versions numbers from v2.6.27), and didn't
>> > realize that that messes up bisection in a big way.
>>
>> Is it appropriate for me to respond to these things?
>
> Yes. I added you to the cc exactly because it was hard for me to judge
> from the email discussion that is linked to in the regression list whether
> you actually _did_ mark some versions good because of confusion about the
> version numbering.

Oh, didn't know you CC'd me.  I have just been searching for my name
to try and keep up to date on threads I participated in, because the
list volume is just too much.

> So you may well have done everything right, and I'm not trying to blame
> you. I just was hoping that maybe that confusion would explain why the
> bisection didn't seem to pinpoint anything sane..

This gave me a bit of a chuckle. ROFL.  I didn't think you were
_blaming_ me.  And even if you were, I'd just say "I'M HUMAN MAN". ;)

It is very well possible that I simply booted the wrong kernel, seeing
I had like 20 to choose from at the time, after doing all those
bisects.  This time, I will make the new kernels the default so that
it is impossible to happen again, assuming that is what happened.  I
will also stop and start alsa 2 or 3 times, in case it is a deadlock
timing issue as you mentioned.

I'm glad to know that I shouldn't be switching kernel versions though.
 I thought that was really crazy.

>
>
> It would be good, especially if this bug doesn't end up being solved some
> other way... And slow results are better than no results at all ;)
>
>                        Linus
>

Okay, I will try again.  Hopefully in a few days I'll have something
for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/