linux-kernel - Re: [RFI] Shared accounting for memory resource controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:07:33 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Shared accounting for memory resource controller

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:34:01 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-04-08 15:15:29]:
> 
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:59:04 +0530
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > > no serious intention.
> > > > Just because you wrote "expect the user to account all cached pages as shared" ;)
> > > >
> > > 
> > > OK, I noticed another thing, our RSS accounting is not RSS per-se, it
> > > includes only anon RSS, file backed pages are accounted as cached.
> > > I'll send out a patch to see if we can include anon RSS as well.
> > >  
> > 
> > I think we can't do it in memcg layer without new-hook because file caches
> > are added to radix-tree before mapped.
> > 
> > mm struct has anon_rss and file_rss coutners. Then, you can show
> > sum of total maps of file pages. maybe.
> >
> 
> Yes, correct and that is a hook worth adding, IMHO. Better statistics
> are critical and it will also help us with the shared memory
> accounting. Without that we can't account for file rss in the memory
> cgroup. 
> 
Finally, you'll be asked  "is it necessary ?", if the cost is big.
>From my point of view, I can't see what new information it will give us.
But maybe useful because the user can avoid some calculation.

Cheers,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/