[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871vs3lgsy.wl%vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:56:29 +0200
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove double initialization of retval in load_misc_binary()
At Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:32:48 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Probably, better way is removing both 'retval = -ENOEXEC;' and initialize it within definition.
Agree.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
index c4e8353..f10150f 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -109,14 +109,12 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct file * interp_file = NULL;
char iname[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE];
char *iname_addr = iname;
- int retval;
+ int retval = -ENOEXEC;
int fd_binary = -1;
- retval = -ENOEXEC;
if (!enabled)
goto _ret;
- retval = -ENOEXEC;
if (bprm->recursion_depth > BINPRM_MAX_RECURSION)
goto _ret;
--
wbr, Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists