[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408093834.GJ17934@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:38:34 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/16] POISON: Add page flag for poisoned pages
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:00:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:24:41 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:14:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:09:58 +0200 (CEST) Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Poisoned pages need special handling in the VM and shouldn't be touched
> > > > again. This requires a new page flag. Define it here.
> > >
> > > I wish this patchset didn't change/abuse the well-understood meaning of
> > > the word "poison".
> >
> > Sorry, that's the terminology on the hardware side.
> >
> > If there's much confusion I could rename it HwPoison or somesuch?
>
> I understand that'd be a PITA but I suspect it would be best,
> long-term. Having this conflict in core MM is really pretty bad.
Ok. I'll rename it to HWPoison().
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists