[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408124322.GG18581@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:43:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: galak@...nel.crashing.org, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeremy@...p.org,
ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: (re)Create swiotlb_unmap_single
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > Same here. It makes it easier for us to work on the powerpc arch
> > specific changes for .31 if we can get these into .30. What are you
> > looking at for .31?
>
> I need to finish the dma_mapping_ops cleanups and cross-arch
> unification stuff:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123827903216314&w=2
>
> But the changes to swiotlb is minor. BTW, I have the patches for
> powerpc too.
>
> > Ingo, any comments on that?
if it's genuine fixes we can do it post-rc1, but it looks a tad wide
for that:
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 2 +-
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 3 +-
lib/swiotlb.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
the patches came right in the merge window - that's too late for
IOMMU bits, the patch cutoff is generally the beginning of the merge
window. (Which was on March 23 in this window)
But i can queue them up in the .31 queue if it has all the Acks from
you folks. Becky, mind resending the latest version, with all the
acks in place?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists