[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408135803.GA21624@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:58:03 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86: remove dupilcated #include
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Remove dupilcated #include in arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi <weiyi.huang@...il.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 1 -
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > index 95ea5fa..6d7966d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> > #include <linux/bug.h>
> > #include <linux/nmi.h>
> > #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > -#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>
> Many of those include lines are probably unnecessary. Instead of
> these trivial patches causing churn, would you be interested in
> doing a comprehensive search to eliminate all the unused ones?
> That would be a real step forward. (and this holds for your
> other patches in this series too.)
>
> The include files section of fault.c might be a good template to
> use:
>
> #include <linux/magic.h> /* STACK_END_MAGIC */
> #include <linux/sched.h> /* test_thread_flag(), ... */
> #include <linux/kdebug.h> /* oops_begin/end, ... */
> #include <linux/module.h> /* search_exception_table */
> #include <linux/bootmem.h> /* max_low_pfn */
> #include <linux/kprobes.h> /* __kprobes, ... */
> #include <linux/mmiotrace.h> /* kmmio_handler, ... */
> #include <linux/perf_counter.h> /* perf_swcounter_*(), ... */
>
> #include <asm/traps.h> /* dotraplinkage, ... */
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h> /* pgd_*(), ... */
> #include <asm/kmemcheck.h> /* kmemcheck_*(), ... */
>
> I was able to eliminate half of all include file lines there.
I assume you are aware that when you minimize the # of include file in
the various .c files, then you implicitly add dependency on the includes
the individual .h files have.
If we for example killed the include of <linux/list.h> from <linux/module.h>
with this approach we would likely see random build failures.
It is good to have it cleaned up but we should keep a critical eye on the
header files we use. Sometimes these are the right target
to clean up but as this is a bit more complicated or at least requires
more build testing to do right.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists