[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408135705.GA7556@lenovo>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:57:05 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: do_IRQ - send EOI for x86-32 on irq without
handler
[Ingo Molnar - Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:25:58PM +0200]
|
| * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
|
| >
| > * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
| >
| > > For X86-32 if IRQ has no handler it remains non-Ack'ed
| > > even if APIC is not requested for being disabled.
| > > Fix it.
| >
| > nice fix. Did you observe any real hangs in such a situation, or is
| > this via code review?
Code review
|
| more stuff needs fixing here first:
|
| arch/x86/kernel/irq.c: In function ‘do_IRQ’:
| arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:226: error: ‘disable_apic’ undeclared (first use in this function)
| arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:226: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
| arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:226: error: for each function it appears in.)
|
| like making 'disable_apic' available everywhere.
|
| Or better yet: introduce a dummy apic->write() method in the
| disable_apic=1 case so we can call a straight ack_APIC_irq().
|
| Ingo
|
Ugh! Thanks Ingo! Will check and fix!
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists