[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C60BE0D1-F750-4ED3-B1E6-CCF89F57B6C2@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:10:38 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
beckyb@...nel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeremy@...p.org, ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: (re)Create swiotlb_unmap_single
>>>
>>> the patches came right in the merge window - that's too late for
>>> IOMMU bits, the patch cutoff is generally the beginning of the merge
>>> window. (Which was on March 23 in this window)
>>
>> Fair.
>>
>>> But i can queue them up in the .31 queue if it has all the Acks from
>>> you folks. Becky, mind resending the latest version, with all the
>>> acks in place?
>>
>> I can do this in Becky's abscense this week. The only "acks" I've
>> seen are from FUJITA Tomonori.
>
> _your_ ack (or signoff) counts too - so to me it's plural :-)
I've added my signoff :)
>> Can we ask there be a unique swiotlb branch in your tree to make
>> it easier for us to continue additional swiotlb work as well as
>> arch specific work.
>
> yes - tip:core/iommu is already distinct from tip:x86/iommu and is
> intended for such more generic patches. It has no patches pending
> right now (it just got all merged upstream) - so please use an
> upstream base - 2.6.30-rc1 would be a good starting point.
Just reposted v3 based on 2.6.30-rc1
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists