[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408144842.GK12931@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:48:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm>
Cc: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 54/56] x86: Remove void casts
* Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >>> * Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Fixed patch
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Hm, what was fixed?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I removed casts on pointer arithmetic which probably still needed to be
> >> there to do the arithmetic properly.
> >>
> >
> > ... which pretty much proves the point that these patches should
> > not go via any "trivial" tree.
> >
> > Those additions of mmu pointers you did were outright lethal, i
> > doubt this stuff could have booted on both 32-bit and 64-bit
> > x86.
> >
> > Please dont do this. Or if you do, please double check your
> > change and double check that the relevant vmlinux disassembly is
> > still bit for bit the same.
> >
>
> Thats what I meant by fixed - those changes were removed from the
> patch.
No, i mean, this approach should be changed, and i dont think any
type cast change should go via any trivial tree. It's easy to mess
it up. Please submit them to the maintainer trees.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists