[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440904080854t6a8b6a68sf7ffe02a8752637b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 08:54:27 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irq: only update affinity in chip set_affinity()
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Impact: keep affinity consistent
>>
>> irq_set_affinity() and move_masked_irq() try to assign affinity
>> before calling chip set_affinity(). some archs are assigning again
>> in set_affinity again.
>>
>> something like:
>> cpumask_cpy(desc->affinity, mask);
>> desc->chip->set_affinity(mask);
>>
>> in the failing path, affinity should not be touched.
>>
>> also set_extra_move_desc() ( called by set_affinity) will rely on
>> the old affinity to decide if need to move irq_desc to different
>> node when logical flat apic mode is used.
>>
>> So try remove those assignment, and make some missed arch to
>> assign affinity in their set_affinity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>>
>> --
>> arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c | 6 ++++--
>> arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c | 3 ++-
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 1 +
>> arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/irq.c | 1 +
>> arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c | 3 +++
>> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 3 +++
>> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-irq.c | 6 ++++++
>> arch/mips/sibyte/bcm1480/irq.c | 2 ++
>> arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/irq.c | 2 ++
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c | 5 +++++
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 2 ++
>> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 7 +++++++
>> drivers/xen/events.c | 2 ++
>> kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 ++----
>> kernel/irq/migration.c | 8 +++-----
>> 15 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Hm, this spreads a lot of instances of identical lines:
>
> cpumask_copy(irq_desc[irq].affinity, mask_val);
>
> all around architectures. How is that an improvement?
>
in failing path in set_affinity, for example it can not get vector in
specified cpu,
then affinity should not be changed.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists