linux-kernel - Re: [Lguest] [PATCH 4/5] lguest: use KVM hypercalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49DCCFC9.7060505@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:24:41 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	odie@...aau.dk
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, lguest@...abs.org,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH 4/5] lguest: use KVM hypercalls

Simon Holm Th������������������������ wrote:
> søn, 05 04 2009 kl. 22:34 +0930, skrev Rusty Russell: 
>> On Friday 03 April 2009 08:25:24 Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:
>>> fre, 27 03 2009 kl. 10:22 +1030, skrev Rusty Russell:
>>>> From: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> Impact: cleanup
>>>>
>>>> This patch allow us to use KVM hypercalls
>>> Something has broken in relation to this change. I'm not sure it is this
>>> change itself or one following, but I get the following error when using
>>> lguest:
>>>
>>> lguest: unhandled trap 6 at 0x418726 (0x0)
>> Any chance you didn't rebuild the Launcher?
> 
> Nope, I've double and triple checked that. I still kind of expect
> something weird at my end though, so I'd be interested to know the
> result of others using my config.

I'm seeing the same problem with the attached config. IIRC it was even
the exact same (invalid) address, unfortunately I can't retest right
now since the system is in use. The launcher has been rebuilt.


View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (56815 bytes)