[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408182255.GJ32098@hoeg.nl>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:22:55 +0200
From: Ed Schouten <ed@...eBSD.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency between PTY read() return values
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> A modem disconnect is a hang up which is quite different to an EOF and is
> effectively a security barrier as well (existing users of the tty port
> lose access to it aka revoke())
Ah, I see. I thought of a hangup as being a physical loss of carrier,
not the method of revoking processes from a TTY. So how come a hangup
can be seen by the pseudo-terminal master? Isn't that something that
should only cause file descriptors to the TTY to become invalid?
--
Ed Schouten <ed@...eBSD.org>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists