[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090407221542.91cd3c42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:15:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/16] POISON: Intro
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:09:56 +0200 (CEST) Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Upcoming Intel CPUs have support for recovering from some memory errors. This
> requires the OS to declare a page "poisoned", kill the processes associated
> with it and avoid using it in the future. This patchkit implements
> the necessary infrastructure in the VM.
If the page is clean then we can just toss it and grab a new one from
backing store without killing anyone.
Does the patchset do that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists