[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49DD3041.8020808@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:16:17 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: galak@...nel.crashing.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Allow arch override of address_needs_mapping
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> Becky's patches of last week also added __weak annotations to
>> swiotlb_bus_to_virt, virt_to_bus and bus_to_phys; added the hwdev
>> parameter to swiotlb_bus_to_phys; and added a weak
>> swiotlb_arch_address_needs_mapping. I assume that was needed because
>> powerpc needs non-trivial implementations for those functions.
>>
>
> Hmm, what she added are wrappers of virt_to_bus and bus_to_virt. We
> can remove these and directly use virt_to_bus and bus_to_virt.
>
In general those interfaces are deprecated. Are we un-deprecating
them? Or do you mean adding virt<->bus to dma_ops?
> About __weak address_needs_mapping function, as I said, removing it
> and using dma_map_ops is a proper solution.
>
Fine. Could swiotlb_alloc() just call dma_alloc_coherent() too?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists