| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <86802c440904081659l1ec30838l99fcb9c693363d00@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:59:35 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lcm@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered
inactive device IRQ interrruption
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:30:15PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>> > Impact: Eliminates a race that can leave the system in an
>>> > unusable state
>>> >
>>> > During rapid offlining of multiple CPUs there is a chance
>>> > that an IRQ affinity move destination CPU will be offlined
>>> > before the IRQ affinity move initiated during the offlining
>>> > of a previous CPU completes. This can happen when the device
>>> > is not very active and thus fails to generate the IRQ that is
>>> > needed to complete the IRQ affinity move before the move
>>> > destination CPU is offlined. When this happens there is an
>>> > -EBUSY return from __assign_irq_vector() during the offlining
>>> > of the IRQ move destination CPU which prevents initiation of
>>> > a new IRQ affinity move operation to an online CPU. This
>>> > leaves the IRQ affinity set to an offlined CPU.
>>> >
>>> > I have been able to reproduce the problem on some of our
>>> > systems using the following script. When the system is idle
>>> > the problem often reproduces during the first CPU offlining
>>> > sequence.
>>> >
>>> > #!/bin/sh
>>> >
>>> > SYS_CPU_DIR=/sys/devices/system/cpu
>>> > VICTIM_IRQ=25
>>> > IRQ_MASK=f0
>>> >
>>> > iteration=0
>>> > while true; do
>>> > echo $iteration
>>> > echo $IRQ_MASK > /proc/irq/$VICTIM_IRQ/smp_affinity
>>> > for cpudir in $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu[1-9] $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu??; do
>>> > echo 0 > $cpudir/online
>>> > done
>>> > for cpudir in $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu[1-9] $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu??; do
>>> > echo 1 > $cpudir/online
>>> > done
>>> > iteration=`expr $iteration + 1`
>>> > done
>>> >
>>> > The proposed fix takes advantage of the fact that when all
>>> > CPUs in the old domain are offline there is nothing to be done
>>> > by send_cleanup_vector() during the affinity move completion.
>>> > So, we simply avoid setting cfg->move_in_progress preventing
>>> > the above mentioned -EBUSY return from __assign_irq_vector().
>>> > This allows initiation of a new IRQ affinity move to a CPU
>>> > that is not going offline.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > Index: linux-2.6.30-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
>>> > ===================================================================
>>> > --- linux-2.6.30-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 2009-04-08 09:23:00.000000000 -0700
>>> > +++ linux-2.6.30-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 2009-04-08 09:23:16.000000000 -0700
>>> > @@ -363,7 +363,8 @@ set_extra_move_desc(struct irq_desc *des
>>> > struct irq_cfg *cfg = desc->chip_data;
>>> >
>>> > if (!cfg->move_in_progress) {
>>> > - /* it means that domain is not changed */
>>> > + /* it means that domain has not changed or all CPUs
>>> > + * in old domain are offline */
>>> > if (!cpumask_intersects(desc->affinity, mask))
>>> > cfg->move_desc_pending = 1;
>>> > }
>>> > @@ -1262,8 +1263,11 @@ next:
>>> > current_vector = vector;
>>> > current_offset = offset;
>>> > if (old_vector) {
>>> > - cfg->move_in_progress = 1;
>>> > cpumask_copy(cfg->old_domain, cfg->domain);
>>> > + if (cpumask_intersects(cfg->old_domain,
>>> > + cpu_online_mask)) {
>>> > + cfg->move_in_progress = 1;
>>> > + }
>>> > }
>>> > for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask)
>>> > per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq;
>>> > @@ -2492,7 +2496,8 @@ static void irq_complete_move(struct irq
>>> > if (likely(!cfg->move_desc_pending))
>>> > return;
>>> >
>>> > - /* domain has not changed, but affinity did */
>>> > + /* domain has not changed or all CPUs in old domain
>>> > + * are offline, but affinity changed */
>>> > me = smp_processor_id();
>>> > if (cpumask_test_cpu(me, desc->affinity)) {
>>> > *descp = desc = move_irq_desc(desc, me);
>>> > --
>>>
>>> so you mean during __assign_irq_vector(), cpu_online_mask get updated?
>>
>> No, the CPU being offlined is removed from cpu_online_mask
>> earlier via a call to remove_cpu_from_maps() from
>> cpu_disable_common(). This happens just before fixup_irqs()
>> is called.
>>
>>> with your patch, how about that it just happen right after you check
>>> that second time.
>>>
>>> it seems we are missing some lock_vector_lock() on the remove cpu from
>>> online mask.
>>
>> The remove_cpu_from_maps() call in cpu_disable_common() is vector
>> lock protected:
>> void cpu_disable_common(void)
>> {
>> < snip >
>> /* It's now safe to remove this processor from the online map */
>> lock_vector_lock();
>> remove_cpu_from_maps(cpu);
>> unlock_vector_lock();
>> fixup_irqs();
>> }
>
>
> __assign_irq_vector always has vector_lock locked...
> so cpu_online_mask will not changed during, why do you need to check
> that again in __assign_irq_vector ?
>
looks like you need to clear move_in_progress in fixup_irqs()
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists