[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090409064447.GB14255@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:44:47 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12]: sparc64: Use new dynamic per-cpu allocator.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:37:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 3 +
> arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> index cc12cd4..2185cf9 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ config AUDIT_ARCH
> config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> def_bool y if SPARC64
>
> +config HAVE_DYNAMIC_PER_CPU_AREA
> + def_bool y if SPARC64
> +
Not related to this specific patch - but I wonder if there
is any good reason these HAVE_ varaibles do not follow the
normal pattern with one definition
and users using select to enable it.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists