lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:15:09 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	ReiserFS Development List <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: kill-the-BKL

Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> writes:
>
> So the new lock that replaces the bkl here is a per superblock mutex 

You have to be very careful with this. Mutexes can be slower than
spinlocks (and the new BKL is a spinlock) in some situations, they
typically schedule much more etc., which can be costly. So this might
have actually made it slower if you're unlucky.  There were some
experimental changes recently to make mutexes more behave like
spinlocks, but I don't think they're fully performance equivalent.

Better would be to use spinlocks if possible. I guess you just would
need to find all sleep points and wrap them with lock dropping?

> After this patch, reiserfs suffers from a slight performance regression (for now).

That might be related to the scheduling  behaviour. Watch the reschedule
counters in vmstat 1

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ