[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49DE5260.3070603@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:54:08 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: galak@...nel.crashing.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Allow arch override of address_needs_mapping
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> Hmm, I think that ia64 use swiotlb_alloc_boot too.
>
> ia64 uses swiotlb in two ways; using only swiotlb, using swiotlb and
> hw iommu. The latter is similar what x86 Calgary does.
>
Yes, I see. It also calls swiotlb_init() ->
swiotlb_init_with_default_size(), though I got lost in the
machvec/platform setup, so I couldn't quite work out where
platform_dma_init() gets called from.
But I couldn't see any x86 references to
swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size().
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists