lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18909.15904.704697.734477@notabene.brown>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:15:28 +1000
From:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs poll should keep the poll rule of normal regular file.

On Wednesday April 8, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com wrote:
> 
> Currently, following test programs don't finished.
> 
> % ruby -e '
> Thread.new { sleep }
> File.read("/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies")
> '
> 
> strace expose the reason.
> 
> ...
> open("/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
> ioctl(3, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xbf9fa6b8) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> _llseek(3, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR)            = 0
> select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL)        = 1 (in [3])
> read(3, "1400000 1300000 1200000 1100000 1"..., 4096) = 62
> select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL
> 
> 
> Because Ruby (the scripting language) VM assume select system-call against regular file don't block.
> (POSIX gurantee it.)
> But sysfs_poll() don't keep this rule although sysfs file can read and write always.

It would be nice to include a reference to where POSIX (or SUS)
guarantees it - though I suspect you are right.

I have one piece of code that this would break, but it isn't released
yet and it is never too late to fix things..

However it should be pointed out that /proc/mounts has exactly the
same problems (/proc/mdstat doesn't - I guess I was lucky enough to
get that one right).  So we should "fix" /proc/mounts
(fs/proc/base.c:mounts_poll) at the same time.  Assuming that won't
break anything.

Al:  do you have an opinion about changing mounts_poll to always
report 'readable' to poll??  What would break?

NeilBrown

> 
> This patch restore proper poll behavior to sysfs.
> /sys/block/md*/md/sync_action polling application and another sysfs updating sensitive
> application still can use POLLERR and POLLPRI.
> 
> 
> 
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> --
>  fs/sysfs/file.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
> index 289c43a..4a302f8 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
> @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static unsigned int sysfs_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
>  	if (buffer->event != atomic_read(&od->event))
>  		goto trigger;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return DEFAULT_POLLMASK;
>  
>   trigger:
>  	buffer->needs_read_fill = 1;
> -	return POLLERR|POLLPRI;
> +	return DEFAULT_POLLMASK|POLLERR|POLLPRI;
>  }
>  
>  void sysfs_notify_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ