[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4D1571C8-53B8-4A4E-BCE8-7267ED262189@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:59:18 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: jeremy@...p.org, hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, ian.campbell@...rix.com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Allow arch override of address_needs_mapping
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:01 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> Becky's patches of last week also added __weak annotations to
>> swiotlb_bus_to_virt, virt_to_bus and bus_to_phys; added the hwdev
>> parameter to swiotlb_bus_to_phys; and added a weak
>> swiotlb_arch_address_needs_mapping. I assume that was needed because
>> powerpc needs non-trivial implementations for those functions.
>
> Hmm, what she added are wrappers of virt_to_bus and bus_to_virt. We
> can remove these and directly use virt_to_bus and bus_to_virt.
>
> About __weak address_needs_mapping function, as I said, removing it
> and using dma_map_ops is a proper solution.
Is this something you are looking at doing in the .31 timeframe?
I'm looking at the fact that we need to switch over to using struct
dma_map_ops on ppc. (I'm guessing this might be the patches you
mentioned the other day). If so did you add set_dma_mask() to the
generic dma_map_ops?
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists