lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090409170610.9ee6e8e4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:06:10 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	serue@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devcgroup: skip superfluous checks when found the
 DEV_ALL elem

On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:47:16 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> While walking through the whitelist, if the DEV_ALL item is found,
> no more check is needed.
> 

It's unobvious whether this is a behavioural change, a bugfix or just a
speedup?

> 
> diff --git a/security/device_cgroup.c b/security/device_cgroup.c
> index 5fda7df..b8186ba 100644
> --- a/security/device_cgroup.c
> +++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
> @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ int devcgroup_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(wh, &dev_cgroup->whitelist, list) {
>  		if (wh->type & DEV_ALL)
> -			goto acc_check;
> +			goto found;
>  		if ((wh->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
>  			continue;
>  		if ((wh->type & DEV_CHAR) && !S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode))
> @@ -499,11 +499,12 @@ int devcgroup_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
>  			continue;
>  		if (wh->minor != ~0 && wh->minor != iminor(inode))
>  			continue;
> -acc_check:
> +
>  		if ((mask & MAY_WRITE) && !(wh->access & ACC_WRITE))
>  			continue;
>  		if ((mask & MAY_READ) && !(wh->access & ACC_READ))
>  			continue;
> +found:
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> @@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ int devcgroup_inode_mknod(int mode, dev_t dev)
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(wh, &dev_cgroup->whitelist, list) {
>  		if (wh->type & DEV_ALL)
> -			goto acc_check;
> +			goto found;
>  		if ((wh->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !S_ISBLK(mode))
>  			continue;
>  		if ((wh->type & DEV_CHAR) && !S_ISCHR(mode))
> @@ -536,9 +537,10 @@ int devcgroup_inode_mknod(int mode, dev_t dev)
>  			continue;
>  		if (wh->minor != ~0 && wh->minor != MINOR(dev))
>  			continue;
> -acc_check:
> +
>  		if (!(wh->access & ACC_MKNOD))
>  			continue;
> +found:
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		return 0;
>  	}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ