[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090410170507.GR26366@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:05:07 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unbreak alpha percpu
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:50:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:21:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I certainly personally _much_ prefer this version.
> >
> > It looks like this actually simplifies things for S390 too (no more
> > simple_identifier_##var games), and generally just looks better. And
> > seeing that the S390 special case is no longer S390-specific is also a
> > good sign, imho.
>
> simple_identifier_##var has been debris from back when Ingo forced
> s390 to use asm-generic/percpu.h; if you look at it, you'll see that
> a) it hadn't worked (look at the argument list carefully) and
> b) get_cpu_var() has the working version anyway
>
> Less obvious part is that if it actually *would* work, we'd be screwed -
> unlike get_cpu_var() this sucker is called for things that are not
> simple variables; didn't happen for alpha, but did for s390.
>
> IOW, that's just an old piece of junk that got removed now.
Fsck... It breaks per_cpu_ptr() :-/ OK, back to square one, then...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists