lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090410171544.GA5750@tesla>
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:15:44 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To:	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
CC:	"ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org" <ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] BUG in wiphy_update_regulatory when loading
	ath5k (on latest git)

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:18:23AM -0700, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > Hi, while testing latest Git (i.e. 2.6.30-rc1 + a bit), I hit a bug
> > which killed my keyboard.  SysRQ keys worked, but I couldn't type in X
> > or on the console.
> 
> > This happened when ath5k was loaded dynamically, in response to my
> > pressing the "wireless toggle" key.  (rfkill-input -> eeepc-laptop,
> > which does weird acpi-driven PCI hotplug).
> >
> > Can anyone at least explain where this weird backtrace comes from?
> 
> Scratch that.  I was able to reproduce it once and get a proper dmesg.
> My logs were just dropping all the useful bits.  Here it is (taint is
> due to a libusual bug, note usual-tables(P) in list of modules, no
> binary crap here, honest).
> 
> [   64.995032] ath5k 0000:01:00.0: registered as 'phy0'
> [   65.062652] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 00000004
> [   65.062665] IP: [<e0171332>] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f/0x295
> [cfg80211]
> [   65.062705] *pdpt = 0000000008bf1001 *pde = 0000000000000000
> [   65.062717] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> [   65.062724] last sysfs file: /sys/class/backlight/eeepc/brightness
> [   65.062734] Modules linked in: ath5k(+) mac80211 led_class cfg80211
> i915 drm i2c_algo_bit cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbfillrect ipv6
> rfkill_input joydev usual_tables(P) snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel
> snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep uhci_hcd snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss i2c_i801
> ehci_hcd psmouse serio_raw i2c_core pcspkr atl2 snd_pcm intel_agp
> snd_timer usbcore agpgart eeepc_laptop snd_page_alloc ac video backlight
> output battery rfkill button processor evdev thermal fan ata_generic
> [   65.062839]
> [   65.062849] Pid: 2909, comm: modprobe Tainted: P
> (2.6.30-rc1eeepc #112) 701
> [   65.062860] EIP: 0060:[<e0171332>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
> [   65.062885] EIP is at wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f/0x295 [cfg80211]
> [   65.062894] EAX: 00000000 EBX: c5da0000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c5da0060
> [   65.062904] ESI: 0000001a EDI: c5da0060 EBP: df3bdd70 ESP: df3bdd40
> [   65.062913]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
> [   65.062923] Process modprobe (pid: 2909, ti=df3bc000 task=c5d03000
> task.ti=df3bc000)
> [   65.062930] Stack:
> [   65.062935]  df3bdd90 c5da0060 c04277e0 00000001 00000044 c04277e4
> c5da0060 00000002
> [   65.062953]  00000002 c5da0000 0000001a c5da0060 df3bdda8 e01706a2
> 00000002 00000002
> [   65.062971]  00000282 000080d0 00000068 c5d53500 00000080 00000282
> 00000080 c5da0140
> [   65.062991] Call Trace:
> [   65.062999]  [<e01706a2>] ? wiphy_register+0x122/0x1b7 [cfg80211]
> [   65.063028]  [<e0328e02>] ? ieee80211_register_hw+0xd8/0x346 [mac80211]
> [   65.063069]  [<e06a7c9f>] ? ath5k_hw_set_bssid_mask+0x71/0x78 [ath5k]
> [   65.063099]  [<e06b0c52>] ? ath5k_pci_probe+0xa5c/0xd0a [ath5k]
> [   65.063126]  [<c01a6037>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x16/0x27
> [   65.063146]  [<c01fec95>] ? local_pci_probe+0xe/0x10
> [   65.063162]  [<c01ff526>] ? pci_device_probe+0x48/0x66
> [   65.063176]  [<c024c9fd>] ? driver_probe_device+0x7f/0xf2
> [   65.063193]  [<c024cab3>] ? __driver_attach+0x43/0x5f
> [   65.063205]  [<c024c0af>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x39/0x5a
> [   65.063217]  [<c024c8d0>] ? driver_attach+0x14/0x16
> [   65.063228]  [<c024ca70>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x5f
> [   65.063240]  [<c024c5b3>] ? bus_add_driver+0xd7/0x1e7
> [   65.063252]  [<c024ccb9>] ? driver_register+0x7b/0xd7
> [   65.063272]  [<c01ff827>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x32/0x85
> [   65.063286]  [<e00a8018>] ? init_ath5k_pci+0x18/0x30 [ath5k]
> [   65.063309]  [<c0101131>] ? _stext+0x49/0x10b
> [   65.063322]  [<e00a8000>] ? init_ath5k_pci+0x0/0x30 [ath5k]
> [   65.063330]  [<c012f452>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x4c
> [   65.063330]  [<c013a714>] ? sys_init_module+0x87/0x18b
> [   65.063330]  [<c0102804>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
> [   65.063330] Code: b8 da 17 e0 83 c0 04 e8 92 f9 ff ff 84 c0 75 2a 8b
> 55 d4 8b 42 28 85 c0 74 0c 83 c0 04 e8 7c f9 ff ff 84 c0 75 14 a1 bc da
> 17 e0 <83> 78 04 03 74 66 8b 4d d4 80 79 08 00 74 5d a1 e0 d2 17 e0 48
> [   65.063330] EIP: [<e0171332>] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f/0x295


What do you mean by you 2.6.30-rc1 + a bit. Are you using an unmodified
wireless-testing or are you applying patches on top?

Whip out gdb as follows:

gdb net/wireless/cfg80211.ko

Then do:

l *(wiphy_update_regulatory+0x20f)

That should show you the culprit line.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ