[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904101958.46245.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:58:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspend-to-ram broken on X61 thinkpads in 2.6.30-rc1?
On Friday 10 April 2009, Jeff Chua wrote:
> 2009/4/10 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> > On Friday 10 April 2009, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >> Hi, has anyone else noticed that suspend-to-ram seems to have gotten
> >> broken in 2.6.30-rc1, sometime during last half of the merge window?
>
> My X61 STR is broken as well.
>
> > There was one similar report, but that issue should be fixed in 2.6.30-rc1
> > if I remember correctly.
> >
> > Can you test commit 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f
> > (PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming device interrupts), plaese?
>
> This commit is in the latest git, but it's does not seem to fix the
> problem. 2.6.29 STR works very well. And all the Think "Fn" keys are
> no longer working (LID close still functioning though ... but that
> could a configuration issue moving from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30-rc1.
I meant please test the kernel where commit
0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f is the head. It is possible that one
of the commits immediately following it broke things. If that's the case, this
kernel will work for you.
> Shall I do the bisecting? I think this is the only one not working for
> me other than the slow iptables that I reported earlier.
Please first do the test above.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists