[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904102010220.21577@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:11:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: declaration patches
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 18:51 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > > index 8499000..d1bac67 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
> > > #include <asm/setup.h>
> > > #include <asm/irq_remapping.h>
> > > #include <asm/hpet.h>
> > > +#include <asm/hw_irq.h> /* smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt */
> >
> > Can we please avoid these useless comments all over the place ?
> >
>
> I kept these intentionally because few of these declarations I have
> already fixed earlier.
> For example during process.c unification work developers forget to
> include and fix syscalls.h :
And how does such a comment help not to forget anything ? It's useless
information and just irritating to read like all end of line comments.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists