[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49DFB447.5040009@interlog.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:04:07 -0400
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
To: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@...rdog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
LKML-SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mike.miller@...com,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: READ CAPACITY (16) failing
Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:54:48PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:43:57PM -0500, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
>>> I'm working on the HP Smart Array SCSI driver (hpsa) and I'm seeing the
>>> following failures:
>>>
>>> hpsa1: <0x3230> at PCI 0000:02:00.0 IRQ 76 using DAC
>>> scsi4 : hpsa
>>> scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access HP LOGICAL VOLUME 5.20 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>>> sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg4 type 0
>>> sd 4:0:0:0: [sdd] READ CAPACITY(16) failed
>>> sd 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Result: hostbyte=DID_ABORT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
>>> sd 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Sense not available.
>>> hpsa: cp ffff8800cf400000 has check condition: unknown type: Sense: 0x5,
>>> ASC: 0x20, ASCQ: 0x0, Returning result: 0x2, cmd=[a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10
>>> 00]
>>> The READ CAPACITY failures are what I'm concerned about. I can't seem to track
>>> down why that's failing.
>>> I've tried printing out the_result from sd but it's not printing out. I'm
>>> assuming that anytime I load the driver it goes thru sd.
>>>
>>> if (the_result) {
>>> sense_valid = scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr);
>>> if (sense_valid &&
>>> sshdr.sense_key == ILLEGAL_REQUEST &&
>>> (sshdr.asc == 0x20 || sshdr.asc == 0x24) &&
>>> sshdr.ascq == 0x00)
>>> /* Invalid Command Operation Code or
>>> * Invalid Field in CDB, just retry
>>> * silently with RC10 */
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> retries--;
>>> } while (the_result && retries);
>>> printk(KERN_WARNING "sd-mfm: the_result = %d\n", the_result);
>> Probably the device you're testing against doesn't support RC16, which
>> is fine. But for some reason, we're not getting valid sense data back
>> from the device. Now, there's two responses to this that seem rational
>> to me:
>>
>> - In sd.c, if the drive has returned no/invalid sense data, try RC10
>> silently, just like the 0x20 / 0x24 ASC case.
>> - Find out why this drive doesn't report valid sense data when attached
>> to hpsa. I assume it does report valid sense data when attached to
>> some other scsi card?
>
> Me again,
> The controllers do support RC16. After some more work it looks like RC16 is
> never getting to the driver. I'm snooping the CDB's of all requests as well
> as the completions from the driver and I never see a 0x9e. I do see the
> RC10 (0x25) though, so I think my debug is right.
>
> Why would I never the see the command in the driver?
struct Scsi_host::max_cmd_len < 16 would be one reason but
one would expect an indicative message in the log.
Does a 'sg_readcap --long -vvv <device>' give you any further
information?
Doug Gilbert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists