[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090411171418.GB14287@kibblesnbits.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:14:18 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29: can't resume from suspend with DMAR (intel iommu) enabled
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 09:52:39AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Does this include backporting the interrupt remapping fixes, or just
> > ignoring it since none of the current laptop chipsets support it?
>
> The latter. What I've done so far is quite large for a -stable
> submission already. The interrupt remapping stuff would be even more
> intrusive, and I'm entirely unconvinced that we actually _need_ it for
> current systems.
>
> I could make it refuse to suspend in intr_remap is enabled, I suppose --
> that would be simple enough.
>
Right, that's what I was afraid of. I think refusing to suspend is probably
a good idea. I'm probably not the only person who suspends his desktop
machines when they're not in use...
regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists