lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904111049010.4583@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, shemminger@...tta.com,
	jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, kaber@...sh.net,
	r000n@...0n.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iptables very slow after commit
 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49



On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> iptables works in whole tables.

Not really.

Yes, iptables as a single command works in whole tables.

USERS, on the other hand, often work in multiple iptables commands, ie 
they just add things to the tables. And in fact, I think this is the exact 
workload that Jeff complains about - doing two hundred "update table" 
commands.

> Userspace submits a table, checkentry is called for all rules in the new 
> table, things are swapped, then destroy is called for all rules in the 
> old table. By that logic (which existed since dawn I think), only the 
> swap operation needs to be locked.

The problem is, the new code makes the "wait after swap" thing happen 
after every switch. And if you do two hundred "update table" commands, you 
now take a _long_ time to update.

Sure, you could tell people to just do everything as one single table 
update, but that isn't what they do.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ