| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200904112032.49335.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:32:48 +0200 From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com> To: Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jengelh@...ozas.de, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, shemminger@...tta.com, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, dada1@...mosbay.com, kaber@...sh.net, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 On Saturday 11 of April 2009, Kyle Moffett wrote: > Almost all of the standard firewall tools (such as shorewall, etc) are > already using iptables-restore command to load firewall rules, > primarily because using separate iptables commands was *already* way > too slow. Some time ago there was batch patch that allowed to use standard shell format of calling iptables but did everything at once: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004- September/016704.html It didn't get merged - no idea why. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists