[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090411070035.GB11799@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:00:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] x86, PAT, CPA: Cleanups and minor bug fixes
* Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:26 -0700, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com wrote:
> > This patchset contains cleanups and minor bug fixes in x86 PAT and CPA
> > related code. The bugs were mostly found by code inspection. There
> > should not be any functionality changes with this patchset.
>
> I've been curious, what are you using to test PAT changes for
> regressions? I've got some regression tests at:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/
>
> Requires KMS enabled and master of libdrm, but after that you can
> sudo make check, and it tests execution of several DRM paths
> without requiring X. In benchmarks/ there are a few
> microbenchmarks of various mapping types, which has been useful in
> making sure that we're ending up with the right PTEs.
Looks really nice! Regarding libdrm, is there a version cutoff from
where it is expected to work just fine? I've got this version:
libdrm-2.4.6-3.fc11.x86_64.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists