[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E213AE.4060506@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:15:42 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing NVMHCI...
Alan Cox wrote:
>> The atomic building units (sector size, block size, etc) of NTFS are
>> entirely parametric. The maximum values could be bigger than the
>> currently "configured" maximum limits.
>>
>
> That isn't what bites you - you can run 8K-32K ext2 file systems but if
> your physical page size is smaller than the fs page size you have a
> problem.
>
> The question is whether the NT VM can cope rather than the fs.
>
A quick test shows that it can. I didn't try mmap(), but copying files
around worked.
Did you expect it not to work?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists