[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090412132150.GD20281@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:21:50 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: declaration patches
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 19:29 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > The above is a lot ifdefs just to:
> > 1) use asmlinkage only on 64 bit
> > 2) hide the prototype if do not implement the function
> >
> > Is there any relevant cost associated with asmlinkage or could we just make it
> > always asmlinkage?
> >
>
> Ok fixed asmlinkage issue.
>
> and also fixed thomas's comment issue.
>
> So here is new pull request:
> The following changes since commit 7fd61bdf06572f1ca681aa35f5c86531a821ea75:
> Ingo Molnar (1):
> Merge branch 'x86/urgent'
Looks good - i've applied this as a single patch to tip:x86/cleanups
because it's now all simple enough, and because i had to fix a few
details in the individual subject lines. So it was easier to do it
in one bunch based on the shortlog.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists