linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] blktrace: fix output of BLK_TC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49E28A94.1050700@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:43:00 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blktrace: fix output of BLK_TC_PC events

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Apr 12 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ingo,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to ask what's the status of these 2 patches.
>>>>
>>>> Arnaldo acked on them.
>>> They looked good to me - but i'm waiting for an Ack from Jens. Jens 
>>> has complained about seeing un-ack-ed patches in the blktrace code, 
>>> so i've started serializing any new patches on acks from Jens. The 
>>> workflow would be more efficient i suspect if Jens 
>>> nominated/declared you and Arnaldo as blktrace co-maintainers too - 
>>> most of the patches come from you two.
>> I'd be fine with listing Li Zefan as co-maintainer of the blktrace 
>> bits. He knows what he is doing and is also a user of blktrace, so 
>> I think he would be fine. Li, what do you think?
> 
> Cool ... i've also taken this as an implicit approval from you of Li 
> sending blktrace patches so i have queued the two up.
> 

Thanks!

> The next big (and nice!) step would be the blktrace events in 
> TRACE_EVENT() style. That would integrate the blktrace tracepoints 
> with all the others, in one coherent framework.
> 

As I mentioned in another mail thread, this is what we are planning
to do. :)

--
Zefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/