linux-kernel - dm-multipath and write request ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e108260904130422k2ac92e64jb5aff1cc2adc8da0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:22:49 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: dm-multipath and write request ordering

Hello,

Several people are using the dm-multipath software as follows:
* Linux server A is using dm-multipath to access data stored on
servers B and C via two iSCSI sessions -- one session between servers
A and B and one session between servers A and C.
* On servers B and C iSCSI target software exports a block device that
is replicated between servers B and C.

Round-robin load balancing will only work correctly in such a setup if
the replication software knows the order in which write requests have
been queued on the dm-multipath device. Since iSCSI uses the TCP/IP
protocol, write requests generated by server A can arrive out-of-order
on servers B and C. My questions are as follows:
- Is it correct that round-robin load balancing can only work
correctly in such a setup with proper support for write barriers in
the device mapper ?
- Did I understand it correctly that the current dm implementation
only supports barriers when remapping a single underlying device ?
- Are there any plans to add barrier support to dm-multipath ?

This is where I obtained my information about device mapper from:
[1] Jonathan Corbet, Multipath support in the device mapper, February
2005, http://lwn.net/Articles/124703/.
[2] Andi Kleen, [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM
devices, February 2008, http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/125
[3] Stefan Bader, [2.6.23 PATCH 11/18] dm: disable barriers, July
2007, http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/11/432.
[4] dm source code,
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.29.y.git;a=tree;f=drivers/md;h=e0a3c2abb32bcec01c192217cda3f085e91217f3;hb=HEAD.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/