[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090413163101.GD32368@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:31:01 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: tom.leiming@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: kzfree object in _release function
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:16:26AM +0800, tom.leiming@...il.com wrote:
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
>
> It helps to troubleshoot the __buggy__ case, in which
> unreferenced objects are still accessed, using kzfree
> to free objects safely in _release function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> ---
> lib/kobject.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
> index a6dec32..cb5a562 100644
> --- a/lib/kobject.c
> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ void kobject_put(struct kobject *kobj)
> static void dynamic_kobj_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> pr_debug("kobject: (%p): %s\n", kobj, __func__);
> - kfree(kobj);
> + kzfree(kobj);
> }
>
> static struct kobj_type dynamic_kobj_ktype = {
> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ static void kset_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> struct kset *kset = container_of(kobj, struct kset, kobj);
> pr_debug("kobject: '%s' (%p): %s\n",
> kobject_name(kobj), kobj, __func__);
> - kfree(kset);
> + kzfree(kset);
What about slab-poisoning? Shouldn't we just rely on that instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists