linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] add self-tests for rfc4309(ccm(aes))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:03:48 -0400
From:	Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add self-tests for rfc4309(ccm(aes))

On Thursday 09 April 2009 22:31:08 Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:16:53PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 April 2009 14:52:04 Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 02:34:59PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > > Patch is against current cryptodev-2.6 tree, successfully tested via
> > > > 'modprobe tcrypt type=45'. The number of test vectors might be a bit
> > > > excessive, but I tried to hit a wide range of combinations of varying
> > > > key sizes, associate data lengths, input lengths and pass/fail.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>

Ugh. I clearly missed *something* when testing, there's no way the patch
I sent actually fully passed. I have things working for real now though
locally, including a back-port to a certain 2.6.18-based kernel. :)

Updated patch or patches forthcoming... (probably tomorrow)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/